Factors of family well-being, stages and crisis periods of marriage (part 2)
The source of difficulties in family life may be the personality characteristics of one or both spouses. We are talking about traits that initially corresponded to the norm, but were…

Continue reading →

Mechanisms for family integration
Social and functional mechanisms of family integration E. G. Eidemiller and V. V. Justitsky (1990) call a set of psychological processes that cover family members and their relationships, leading to…

Continue reading →

Structural and role functioning of the family and its violations (part 1)
The family, as a system, on the one hand has a physical structure represented by specific members, and, on the other hand, there is a structure of relations in the…

Continue reading →

“The parameters of a family system»

There are six main parameters of the family system:

Patterns of interaction
Family rules
Family myths
Beyond the family
The stabilizers of the family
Family history
1. Stereotypes of family interaction
They are understood as messages that family members exchange with each other (the husband smiles at the wife, and she in response shows the language-the preamble to the scandal or sex, etc.). Any event is a message in the family. The thunder of pots in the kitchen can mean the mother’s anger).

Message type:

Single-level (on one channel) – for example, the sound of a door slamming.
Two-level – the sound of a door slamming, plus a shout to catch up.
Multilevel.
One level is always verbal, the 2nd level is non-verbal

Two-level and multi-level messages are divided into:

Congruent (coincident).
Non-congruent (mismatched, divergent).
If the content of the information on 2 channels is the same-congruent.

What’s up? – smile and “all is well” – congruent message. If he says “all is well” and lowers his head, it is not a congruent message.

These interactions are often repetitive, and those stereotypes that are often repeated are called interaction stereotypes.

In the functional family a large part of patterns of interaction is functional (congruent).

Joy on the face, in the voice and words, as well as sadness-congruent character. When stereotypes of interaction are congruent, then all events in the family are clear and understandable, as well as emotions and relationships. At the same time, there is a free emotional exchange, the family is able to develop sound decisions, peace and tranquility reigns in it.

Analysis of pathogenic (non-congruent) interaction stereotypes is of particular interest for a problem family.

For example, a teenager comes home, says that everything is fine and at the same time puts his head down. This is a reason for parental anxiety, fantasies about what happened, distrust, and a desire to confirm what happened. Emotional tension increases, and a family problem arises. And if the mother, father, son and grandmother have it, they begin to exchange, the tension accumulates, and a pathogenic stereotype of interaction in the family arises. No one finds support from anyone. Such stereotypes lead to serious violations of interaction in the family. The more dysfunctional a family is, the more incongruent stereotypes we encounter.

You need to observe the interaction in the family and choose non-congruence, so that you can then assign the correct correction. Stereotypes can only be tracked by observing the family as a whole. The most significant stereotype is that described in the late ‘ 69s by a group of American psychologists led by Gregory Bateson. They first investigated the forms of communication in families with schizophrenia patients. As a result, they found that each of these families has a special stereotype of a double bond.

The essence of double communication is that the child constantly receives non-congruent messages in a situation where he can not get out or pull away or check the very situation of interaction. Mothers verbally told their children that they loved them, but this was not verbally confirmed. The child is small and cannot check the correctness of the message. On one level of communication, dislike is shown, and on the other (verbal), love is spoken.

If the child receives such a double message, there is a state of confusion-which part of this double message to believe? Accordingly, the child can not get the proper emotional attachment. Join the “I love you” – she moved away. I’ll join “move away” – she’ll scold me. Such a child is in a state of chronic confusion. Schizophrenia, in this case, is a kind of way out of a state of constant confusion, through autism.

In this case, the consultant contributes to the transformation of non-congruent stereotypes into congruent ones. Non-congruent stereotypes are a very strong habit, you can’t change it until you see yourself from the outside.

Grandparents (grandparents) in the system of family relations (part 1)
The relationship between generations can be viewed in various aspects: as a historically and culturally variable phenomenon; as a psychological inheritance; as the personal relationships of grandparents and their children…

...

Making a decision about marriage
The most significant for the pre-marital period is the motivation for marriage. Decision-making is often polimotivated, such motives can be identified: love, duty, spiritual closeness, material calculation, psychological compliance, and…

...

Specifics of the premarital period
The results of many studies have shown that the combination of premarital factors that prompted young people to enter into a family Union significantly affects the success of adaptation of…

...

Beyond the family
Every family is a system, and every system has its own structure and boundaries. The boundaries of the family depend closely on the state of the boundaries of large social…

...